Edit ModuleShow Tags

Jun 29, 201510:23 AM
The Editor's Room

Weekly Commentary with New Orleans Magazine’s Errol Laborde

What to Do About Robert E. Lee?

         Of the three monuments facing the firing squad of political correctness, clemency, if it is to be granted, should be considered for Robert E. Lee.

         Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederate States of America, is best known locally for having died here, and for providing Biloxi a tourist attraction with Beauvoir, his post-war home.

         One person who would probably support removing Davis’ monument is P.G.T. Beauregard, who once said of the Confederate president that, “We have always been enemies.” Among their rants, the two men blamed each other for the loss of the war.

         Beauregard was from St. Bernard Parish; he was of French ancestry, and was considered to be a decent citizen, so much so that he was made a supervisor of the original Louisiana Lottery, partially because he evoked trust. Whether Davis’ and Beauregard’s resumes are enough to inspire the continuity of their monuments is subject to debate, but in these days it seems clear which way the debate is going. (Beauregard’s name has already been removed from the public school that was once named after him.)

         Lee, however, is different. He is a complex figure, molded by a complex time, who tried to do right. Like the Founding Fathers who preceded him by less than a century – including Washington and Jefferson – his family had slaves, a common practice in a pre-mechanized agrarian economy. He never purchased any though. Those that he had were handed down through the family. In his comments and writings he had contempt for the practice, which he saw as something that was tolerated by Providence that would one day be ended likewise. In a letter written as early as 1856 he said this about slavery: “There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil.”

         What was important to Lee was not the cause but the place, and that place was Virginia. Early in the war Lee, as the military’s brightest star, was offered control of the Union Army. Had he accepted, the Civil War would have likely ended quickly. (For one reason, the Union would not have had to contend with Lee on the other side.) Lee himself would have been a heroic figure and likely the frontrunner to succeed Lincoln as President. But then there was Virginia.

         Lee lived in an era when the nation was seen as being secondary to the states that created it. Indeed the upstart country was given a utilitarian name: the “United States.” Of those states Virginia had the right to feel particularly smug. It had already produced four presidents: Washington, Jefferson, Madison and Monroe. The nation’s capital city was carved from a slice of Virginia. Jefferson, a Virginian, wrote the Declaration of Independence; Madison was the mastermind behind the Constitution. The key vote on Independence back in 1776 was in response to a resolution introduced by Virginia through the politicking of Richard Henry Lee, part of the extended family. Robert E. Lee’s father, Lighthorse Harry Lee, served as Virginia’s ninth Governor.

         It would not have been hard for a Virginian, especially one raised around so much history, to look at his state and to feel it as being greater than the nation. What his ancestors had done, leading a rebellious region in breaking away from a mother country (Great Britain), was in the spirit of what this so called “Civil War” was doing. This was just the progression of history.

         Militarily, Lee is remembered as being a great battlefield strategist who was also well respected by his troops. Where he should be most admired though, was for his performance after the war. He, more than anyone else, likely saved the South.

         Imagine the post-war roads and hills of the South being jammed with young men walking or riding home. Drawn into the war during their teenage years, fighting and shooting was what they knew best. Many could have fled to the woods and become guerilla fighters. Some, such as young Jesse James, returned to Missouri and became outlaws. From Maryland through Texas the land could have been ablaze with vigilantes fighting without the discipline of a commander. Lee made it his mission to convince his solders to go home and rebuild their lives. He is perhaps the one person that troops, wearied and defeated, would listen to. Without Lee, the Civil War may have never ended but instead become a continuation of renegade disturbances like in today’s Middle East. The states of the South might have become Balkanized. Louisiana might be part of a lesser nation.

         Reconstruction would be difficult, but amazingly the wishes of the martyred Abraham Lincoln prevailed and the emphasis would be on recovery rather than revenge. (Curiously the South would emerge as the most super-patriotic section of the country – its people more prone to wave the American flag and to proudly belt out the anthem.)

         Race would remain as an issue though, with stutter steps of progress through the years – several steps forward, one step backward then occasionally an outrageous crime by someone who represented no one but who would tear a nation apart. Nevertheless there is an inherent decency in the American people. They want good will for all.

         We will feel this more in the future: Students who have graduated from college over the last 10 years don’t even understand what all the racial tension from the past was all about. Maybe that’s good.

         Those students should, though, understand history and that there are some characters from the past that stood at historic crossroads. Those characters should not be washed away by wholesale stereotypes; rather they should be understood for the ways that they were unique.

         Who gets a monument built in their honor is largely a political decision influenced by the emotions of the times.

         I suspect that Robert E. Lee is now facing his loneliest battle. The old soldier will not be hearing a distant drum roll nor can he expect a cavalry charge. If he cannot be remembered for the war that he fought, he should be respected for the war that he ended. 





BOOK ANNOUNCEMENT: Errol’s Laborde’s new book, Mardi Gras: Chronicles of the New Orleans Carnival (Pelican Publishing Company, 2013), has been released. It is now available at local bookstores and at book websites.

Watch INFORMED SOURCES, Fridays at 7 p.m., repeated at 11:30 p.m. WYES-TV, Ch. 12.



Add your comment:
Edit ModuleShow Tags

The Editor's Room

Weekly Commentary with New Orleans Magazine’s Errol Laborde


Errol LabordeErrol Laborde holds a Ph.D. in political science from the University of New Orleans and is the editor-in-chief of Renaissance Publishing. In that capacity he serves as editor/associate publisher of New Orleans Magazine and editor/publisher of Louisiana Life magazine.

Errol is also a producer and a regular panelist on Informed Sources, a weekly news discussion program broadcast on public television station WYES-TV, Channel 12. Errol is a three-time winner of the Alex Waller Award, the highest award given in print journalism by the Press Club of New Orleans. He also received the National and City Regional Magazine Association Award for Best Column for his New Orleans Magazine column, beating out 76 city magazines across the country. In 2013, Errol received the award for the "Best News Affiliated Blog," awarded by the Press Club of New Orleans.

Errol’s most recent books are Krewe: The Early Carnival from Comus to Zulu and Marched the Day God: A History of the Rex Organization. In his free time he enjoys playing tennis and traveling with his wife, Peggy, to anywhere they can get away to, but some of his favorite spots are the Caribbean and historic locations around Louisiana. You can reach Errol at (504) 830-7235 or errol@myneworleans.com.




Atom Feed Subscribe to the The Editor's Room Feed »

Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags