Save New Orleans’ World Trade Center


If the local World Trade Center had as many tenants as there have been failed plans to redevelop it, there would be no current controversy about what to do with the building. Its capacity would be full.

Unfortunately, the building, which is located at what is often referred to as being the most valuable plot of land in the state, stands closed. The once-glorious visions of it being a center for global trade are as distant as the days of steam freighters hauling bananas to the nearby docks. Times and riverfronts have changed.

There are currently at least three proposals for what to do with the building. Two of the plans would save the building, fix it and develop it for multipurpose use. Another plan calls for tearing down the building and replacing it with an unspecified monument that would, it is hoped, become a symbol of the city. The St. Louis Gateway Arch and the Sydney Opera House are often mentioned as examples. We take no position on which of the restoration plans should be adopted, however we do feel strongly that the building should be allowed to stand. We do so for several reasons:

• Even in its rundown state it is a handsome building that still has the airy feeling and extra touches (such as a revolving night club space as its crown) worthy of a building standing as a window to the world. Situated as it is on the edge of Spanish Plaza and with statues of Simone Bolivar and Winston Churchill nearby, it can be the centerpiece of an international setting. Done right, the building can be riveting.

• There is a historical importance to the building, which was completed in 1967. Having evolved from the former International Trade Mart, it was at the forefront of the global drive to create World Trade Centers.

• New Orleans is already blessed with landmarks. There are Jackson Square, the steeple of the cathedral and the cupolas of the Cabildo and Presbytere. For something more modern there is the Superdome, freshly scrubbed and with a dazzling new look, especially at night. We are a city of landmarks.

Why the building has not been more successful has had more to do with timing than with structure.

Countries do not invest as much in consular corps as they used to. What were once fully staffed consulates have frequently been replaced by Honorary Consul Generals, many operating out of local law offices. Also with the end of the Cold War, some nations turned their attention to newly liberated countries with fresh opportunities to mine.

Whatever the future of the building will be, its role as a setting for foreign trade will be diminished, yet it can flourish as a setting for hotel rooms, condos, apartments and office space. The building could be one of the most desirable places to live and work in the city. It could also bring new energy to the area that surrounds it.

Restored with thought and ambition the building can ultimately be a monument in itself – one dedicated to commerce – and that’s a statement that the city clearly needs to make.

You Might Also Like

Duty and The Beast

Benjamin Butler’s Occupation of New Orleans

The Wild West at the Time of Rex

Carnival’s formative years and the most dramatic period of the American West paralleled each other.

Quarter Flipping: How Political Appeasement Created a Festival

The origins of French Quarter Festival

The Wonderwall

A half-mile long stationary Mardi Gras.

Graced by the handprint of George Rodrigue

Reader Comments:
Aug 6, 2013 12:17 pm
 Posted by  NOLAW

I feel strongly that the building should not be allowed to stand. Please tear down that eye sore!!!

Aug 6, 2013 02:23 pm
 Posted by  jl6172

The number one reason it should be saved is that it's "handsome" and has an "airy feeling?" That's not a reason to save building. It's also a matter of opinion. Mine is that the building is hideous example of late 60's governmental architecture that should be eradicated from the earth. It doesn't remotely fit the New Orleans aesthetic.

I sometimes wonder if the preservationists in this town just automatically default to the position that every building should be saved regardless of whether or not it, you know, deserves to be saved.

I do agree that we don't really need a new "monument" but that is also not a reason to keep that particular building. Why don't we find a compromise where the developer can tear down the eyesore that is the WTC but build a new mixed use building that features a combination of residential and commercial space? Maybe a museum or gallery of some sort as well.

But we don't need to save the current building just for the sake of saving it.

Add your comment:

Latest Posts

An Ambitious Opening

Square Root, which aims to be a dining destination, is finally set to open.

10 Things to Do In New Orleans This Weekend

Our top picks for things to do in New Orleans this weekend.

Cool Ideas

A refreshing beverage, beer for a good cause, and CoolBrew's 25th birthday

Banh Mis and Mosaics

Celebrating a birthday and a community

Upper Nine Doughnut Company: Making New Traditions

An interview with Glenn Haggerty, co-owner of Upper Nine Doughnut Company